Wednesday, June 29, 2022

I’m a proud stay-at-home girlfriend: Here are my rules

I think I can trump the story below. When I met my third wife in 1983 she was separated, had three young kids and worked as a shop assistant. She was however very bright, very good-hearted and looked good in jeans, so I married her.

I had made some good investment decisions early on in life so I was able to release her from having to work. She became a full-time housewife. And she was a good cook.

To top it off however I also did not work and stayed home most of the day. So I was always available to mind her three bright and lively children while she went out shopping and socializing. Her time was as free as if she had been single and without children.

We split up after 10 years together but have remained good friends. Nearly 40 years after I met her, I still have dinners with her every week

A stay-at-home girlfriend has laid down the law with a stern set of rules that her man abides by – and what he agrees to may surprise you.

Leaha Ureel, a 22-year-old from Michigan, US, wears her stay-at-home girlfriend crown with pride.

She never pays for meals, pulls out her own chair or pours her own wine.

And, of course, she doesn’t have a job and she sure as heck doesn’t want one, either.

Leaha said she used to avoid men she dated in her single days when they didn’t dress sharp enough.

She even broke up with her boyfriend, Alan, after having the epiphany she needed to live a life of being waited on hand and foot.

“I wanted time for myself and to have someone to provide for me,” Leaha said. “Alan wasn’t able to provide for me at that point so we broke up.”

After a few months though, Alan, a 23-year-old contractor, got the message and proposed to Leaha — once he “stepped up to her standards”.

Alan met the criteria after setting up a home-renovation business in the interest of supporting his other half. He even carves out time from work to get coffee with Leaha now the pair are married.

“He stepped up — now he arranges and takes me for dates at least twice a week. I like him to take initiative and book a restaurant for a meal or choose what we are doing,” she said.

Meanwhile Leaha, who has a university degree and used to wait tables, gets to spend her days as she wishes.

“Now I go for walks with the dogs and spend lots of my time cooking,” she said.

“I love being a housewife, and I want others to know that it is OK to aspire to have this lifestyle.”

Leaha also took the time to pass along some red flags to spot in providers for anyone else who wants to live her lifestyle.

If they’re commenting on prices, not tipping at restaurants, making comments about underdressing or rescheduling things last minute – then it’s time to find someone else she said.

“I’m not ashamed to be a stay-at-home wife … I don’t think there should be shame over wanting to be a stay-at-home girlfriend or wife,” she said.

“It’s your life, so you choose how you would like to live it.”


Racist Attacks on Clarence Thomas from the Left

Clarence Thomas does not respond to criticism that he fails to hew the liberal line because he is black, according to a friend. The Supreme Court justice instead prefers to ignore it.

There’s a lot to ignore in the aftermath of the ruling Friday by Thomas and others on the court overturning Roe v. Wade.

Actor Samuel Jackson called the justice “Uncle Clarence” on Twitter, an apparent play on the “Uncle Tom” insult. Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot shouted “F*** Clarence Thomas!” on stage at an LGBT “pride” event. Many on social media called him the N-word and other racial slurs.

Mark Paoletta, a former White House lawyer and “close friend” of Thomas, according to Fox News, said the conservative justice is not affected by racist attacks.

“The left is racist, Tucker,” Paoletta said Monday in an interview on “Tucker Carlson Tonight.”

“They expect Clarence Thomas to think the way a black man should, based on the color of his skin,” he said. “And Clarence Thomas for 30 years, 40 years has refused to do that, and they want to destroy him. And that’s what they’ve been doing in coming after him.

“The bottom line is, Clarence Thomas doesn’t care at all what they think.”

Paoletta added, “They will go after him, but it is a great day for the Constitution, you know, with Roe being overturned, with the Second Amendment being strengthened consistent with the Constitution, with religious liberties coming down consistent with the Constitution, and it is all aligning with where Clarence Thomas has been for the past 30 years.”

During a speech in Utah this spring, Thomas mocked those who criticize his views, according to the Deseret News.

The justice noted that his law clerks complained to him recently that he espoused “conservative white ideas.”

“That’s really interesting,” the 74-year-old Thomas said. “I didn’t know that there were these particular ideas that were off-limits — you get like white-only water fountains, now you get white-only ideas.

“The more things change, the more they remain the same.”

Thomas noted in a May speech that his difficulties are not with fellow black people, according to The Washington Post.

“People assume that I’ve had difficulties when I’ve been around members of my race,” he said.

“It’s just the opposite. The only people with whom I’ve had difficulties are white, liberal elites who consider themselves the anointed and us the benighted. … I have never had issues with members of my race.”


Calling Justice Thomas ‘Uncle Clarence’ exposes the rotten sham that is the progressive movement

A festering rot of racial animosity exists in our society that we willfully ignore socially and politically. It is a rot that eats away at the flesh of our civil society and spoils the greatness of our multicultural nation.

Progressives continually tell us we have blinders on when it comes to racism in American society. They’ve shoved their ideological solution of anti-racism to force us to “deconstruct” what they believe is an inherently deep-seated racist nation. I, as a black American, am supposed to rejoice in the presence of our self-appointed saviors, but I peeked behind the veil and saw who they really are.

Understandably, detractors of the decision have found themselves angry and anguished at last week’s Supreme Court reversal of Roe v. Wade. Six judges found it necessary to overturn, but just one has been elected the face of all political animus: Clarence Thomas, who didn’t even write the court’s opinion.

They say that in times of stress, anger and anguish, you see who people really are. These moments are rare but special because you get to see how much of their rhetoric manifests in action and how much is lip service.

With overwhelming anger seeping through their pores, Democrats saw only one viable target who would satisfy their rage. There was only one person for whom they felt comfortable exposing themselves by lifting the veil of their true hatred and indifference for black people.

In a matter of hours, “Uncle Clarence” was trending on Twitter, a reference to the racist pejorative “Uncle Tom.” I witnessed multiple conversations between white progressives questioning if Clarence knows he’s black, chastising him for being married to a white woman and even going so far as to feel completely comfortable calling him a n–ger.

Don’t believe me? Do a Twitter search yourself.

Just one example: Left-wing Canadian pollster John Corbett tweeted, “Clarence Thomas: Just another dumb field n–ger.”

Even more disappointing, many black progressive Democrats stood by and said nothing. I listened to a Twitter Spaces discussion in which a white man said, verbatim, “Clarence Thomas is a n–ger” on a mostly black panel, and no one said a thing. Why would they allow this without pushback? Because they aren’t principled either.

White progressives feel emboldened to use racially inflammatory language like “Uncle Tom” and “coon” directed at black people who don’t behave the way they feel is acceptably black because black progressives allow it to happen.

Samuel L. Jackson, for example, gave the racist bat signal to all his white elitist progressive allies when he tweeted, “How’s Uncle Clarence feeling about Overturning Loving v Virginia??!!” Today, it’s Uncle Clarence, but tomorrow it can be Uncle Samuel, and that’s the point he’s missing.

You cannot claim to be pro-black while selectively caring about which black person takes racial abuse. You cannot claim to be “anti-racist” if some racism is OK with you. You do not have to support Clarence Thomas’ political positions to find something highly unconscionable about how the man has been treated based simply on his race.

The veil has been lifted, and this is who they are. The progressive movement is a sham along with its boutique anti-racism ideology. The deep-seated hatred that progressives claim exists among the American public actually rots inside them, not us.

While everyone else has had their fingers clamped firmly on their noses to avoid the stench, I’ve been smelling this rot spread throughout my old political party for years. I used to believe Democrats were the party of fairness, liberal values and rationality, but they’ve allowed the rot to spread to all their messaging and have willfully leaned into the stench.

Instead of being repelled by the putrid smell of superficial identity politics, they’ve convinced themselves it’s a perfume-like fragrance everyone should enjoy. They’ve allowed racist leftist ideologues to smell up the joint, forcing many black Americans like me to choose political homelessness over a home that reeks of immorality.

This isn’t about Clarence Thomas; it is about addressing what is right and what is moral. Thomas doesn’t need my defense; he’s a grown man and can handle himself when labeled a misbehaving Negro.

If you are OK with white people calling any black person a n–ger, you are part of the rot. If you are OK with white people calling black people they disagree with politically “Uncle Toms,” you are part of the rot. If you cannot smell the rot, it is because you are it.

The veil has been lifted; this is who they are. Believe them.


Hannity: Dems have descended into full-blown lying, hysteria yet again

SEAN HANNITY: We begin with the left's weekend of rage and despair and lying and fundraising emails even. Roe v Wade is no more. Democrats have descended into a state of full-blown lying, hysteria yet again. Now, keep in mind, this decision did not outlaw abortion in America. Instead, they decided who will decide. They return the issue to the states to decide.

Your elected officials. So ultimately, the American people will decide allowing voters to debate, decide the rules and regulations surrounding abortion in their respective states. But Democrats are not interested in honest debate.

So over the weekend, they took to the streets as some proudly display very graphic, vulgar signs like this one here calling Justice Amy Coney Barrett a well, I can't even say it. Another sign telling the justices to burn in hell. Others evoking coat hangers displayed cartoon genitalia and stated that God was pro-killing babies. One common theme at all the demonstrations in America that we are doomed and the Supreme Court needs to go. In other words, they are calling for an insurrection against a co-equal branch of government.

Now, The New York Times even detailed what they call a step-by-step plan to discipline the U.S. Supreme Court by impeaching justices and packing the court. And according to top Democrats, well, one way or the other, the U.S. Supreme Court must be punished.




No comments: