Monday, September 05, 2016
The Migrant Rape Epidemic in Germany and the Descent into Madness
This is particularly disturbing to those of us who know what a safe and peaceful country Germany was until recently
The staggering number of sex crimes committed in a single month in Germany (July 2016) by non-White immigrants will give us an idea of the scale of this problem on an annual basis. Never before in peacetime have the women of any single nation been sexually assaulted and raped on such an industrial scale. Females of all ages, from toddlers to women in their late seventies, are included in the grim statistics. Most of the victims are young rather than old; and their assailants, who are of all ages, are almost invariably single men who are described coyly in official documents as “Southerners”, or, more audaciously, as “dark-skinned foreigners”.
Allow me to insert at this point the first of three lists of sex crimes committed by immigrants to Germany in the single month of July 2016. The three dates are randomly chosen at regular ten-day intervals: July 1, July 10, and July 20. This will give you a pretty good idea of what is going on in Germany nowadays.
First, then, the details for July 1, 2016.
July 1, 2016: A 25-year-old migrant from Pakistan sexually assaulted a 15-year-old girl in a public square in Perleberg. A “southern guy” (südländischer Typ) sexually assaulted a young woman in Nürnberg. A “dark-skinned” man (dunkelhäutig) groped a 15-year-old girl in Magdeburg. A 34-year-old migrant exposed himself to passersby in Oldenburg. A man speaking “broken German” sexually assaulted a 20-year-old woman in Ibbenbüren.
Police were searching for a “southern looking man” (südländisch aussehende Mann) who assaulted a 73-year-old man walking his dog in Sindelfingen. The migrant came up behind the elderly man, grabbed his crotch and demanded to have sex with him. The elderly man tried to get away by getting into his parked car, but the migrant jumped into the passenger seat and again demanded sex. The migrant ran away when a passerby walking her three dogs approached the parked car.
Meanwhile, a 32-year-old migrant from Afghanistan photographed two girls, age 12 and 14, who were swimming in the Iller River in Illertissen. As they got out of the water, the man offered to pay them for sex.
The sexual assault on a 73-year-old German pensioner by a male asylum seeker is not only highly exceptional but probably unprecedented in the annals of German history. Attractive little boys often feature as objects of migrant sexual ardor, especially in swimming pools, but wrinkled and tottering old timers in their seventies?—this simply has to be a first. Something perhaps for the Guinness Book of World Records or Ripley’s Believe It Or Not.
The claim that all these rapist hordes from faraway places are desperate “refugees” can be dismissed out of hand as arrant nonsense. Desperate fugitives fleeing persecution in their own lands don’t repay their new hosts by raping their hosts’ womenfolk as soon as they arrive in their new European El Dorado, while begging for asylum at the same time. The idea is self-contradictory. Absurd. These are invaders, pure and simple.
Whether the incoming swarms from the Third World are “Muslims” or not is commonly thought to be irrelevant, at least by the presstitutes of the mainstream media. Not only are ridiculous efforts being made to suppress the ethnic origin of the criminals—too much candor is seen as “racist”—but disingenous attempts are sometimes made to give the impression that the criminals could be white.
It needs to be pointed out in the interests of accuracy that these migrants for the most part come from countries where Islam is the official religion, i.e., Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, and various African countries. Most good Muslims would obviously like to disown these bad Muslims, claiming they are either bogus Muslims or Muslims only in name.
But it becomes exceedingly hard to sustain this argument if the same people who are responsible for the plethora of sex crimes listed in this article (and carefully documented in police reports) are also regular mosque attendees, observe Ramadan, read the Qur’an, forbid pork, praise sharia law, insist on their women being veiled, and shout “Allahu Akbar!” at moments of high tension.
According to a recent Gatestone Institute Report, sexual prowlers from foreign lands can now be found lurking in almost every corner. No German is safe from attack in the new multicultural madhouse.
During the month of July 2016, hundreds of German women and children were sexually assaulted by migrants The youngest victim was nine; the oldest, 79. Attacks occurred at beaches, bike trails, cemeteries, discotheques, grocery stores, music festivals, parking garages, playgrounds, schools, shopping malls, taxis, public transportation (buses, trams, intercity express trains and subways), public parks, public squares, public swimming pools and public restrooms. Predators are lurking everywhere; safety [is found] nowhere. “Germany’s Migrant Rape Crisis Spirals out of Control: Suppression of data about migrant rapes is ‘Germany-wide phenomenon.’” by Soeren Kern (August 9, 2016)
These crimes can be neatly classified, beginning with the relatively mild and continuing along a spectrum of escalating severity to the most injurious. Here are some of the indignities to which European women are now being subjected by sexually out-of-control migrants who should never have been let into Europe in the first place. I have identified 17 main categories, though more probably exist:
(1) Low-level sexual harassment, e.g., unwelcome propositions, unsolicited attentions, attempts to “get fresh”. (2) Rude staring at women in trains, waiting rooms etc. (3) Rude finger gestures, obscene tongue thrusting, offensive noises. (4) Bottom pinching. (5) Verbal abuse accompanied by obscenities. (See Appendix, July 23: “We will f**k you, lady!”). (6) Photographing women up their skirts with cell phones. (7) Indecent exposure. (8) Indecent exposure accompanied by masturbation. (9) Groping women. (10) Multiple groping of women by gangs of migrants working in teams. Known as taharrush attacks. (taharrush gamea = “group harassment” in Arabic; taharrush gamea el-ginsy = group sexual harassment). Such attacks have been launched against Western women in Egypt, Germany, Sweden and elsewhere. (* See Note on taharrush attacks below). (11) Forcible fellatio. (12) Sexual assaults with violence, stopping short of rape. (13) Getting women drunk or spiking their drinks in bars with the date rape drug Rohypnol, preliminary to raping them while unconscious. (14) Simple rape, without unnecessary violence, to which a woman will submit passively rather than risk disfigurement and death. (15) Violent rape with grievous bodily harm. (16) Gang rape. (17) Rape or gang rape followed by murder.
* Note on taharrush attacks. A Swedish police report on the taharrush phenomenon has this to say:
In at least ten cases, a lone girl, sometimes around 14-16 years old, sometimes 25-30, was surrounded by several men (from 5-6 up to a large number). In these cases, some of the men held the girl down, while others groped her breasts and body, and in one case some of the men photographed the attack.
In some cases, the perpetrators unbuttoned the girl’s pants and tried—in some cases succeeded—to pull them down before help arrived. There were also cases where several girls who were part of a group were attacked at the same time by a large gang.
A few suspects have been identified. Those identified are citizens of Afghanistan, Eritrea and Somalia. All investigations into cases in Stockholm and Kalmar from 2014 and 2015 were dropped due to lack of evidence or problems with identifying suspects.
This German girl was viciously attacked and disfigured on New Year’s Eve at Stuttgart. She needed surgical treatment. According to her father, her attackers were immigrants. (See here for further details about taharrush, the “rape game” played across Europe by Third World migrants).
Germany’s migrant rape epidemic received one of its earliest reports in September 2015, and again in March 2016. The problem has now spread to cities and towns in all 16 of Germany’s federal states. After factoring in family reunifications, the actual number of migrants could exceed 10 million soon, it has been predicted, and some believe that “Germany’s Muslim population is on track to nearly quadruple to an astonishing 20 million by 2020.”
Is this “scare politics”? Possibly.
N24 television news reports reveal that up to 50 per cent of the asylum seekers arriving in Germany have gone into hiding and their whereabouts are unknown by German authorities. What does this mean? It means there are a lot of illegal immigrants in Germany who have evaded the official statistics. They fuel Germany’s black economy and contribute to much of its crime. Amazingly, 300 newcomers arrive in Germany every hour.
List of Migrant Sex Crimes in Germany, 10 July 2016:
A 19-year-old asylum seeker from Pakistan sexually assaulted a 16-year-old girl at a public swimming pool in Mörfelden-Walldorf. He was arrested and released. A 17-year-old migrant sexually assaulted an 11-year-old girl at a public swimming pool in Hamm. A “southerner” or “African” (südländisch, afrikanisch) man sexually assaulted a 24-year-old woman at a public swimming pool in Babenhausen. A 27-year-old migrant from Afghanistan sexually assaulted two 13-year-old girls at a public swimming pool in Rinteln. Two males aged 16 and 21 sexually assaulted a 13-year-old girl at a public swimming pool in Stuttgart-Vaihingen. A “dark-skinned” (dunklen Teint) man sexually assaulted a 37-year-old woman at a public swimming pool in Dachau.
Two migrants from Iran sexually assaulted three women in downtown Munich. A 28-year-old Syrian asylum seeker exposed himself to a 48-year-old woman in Schweinfurt. A group of migrants from North Africa harassed several women in downtown Flensburg. When a passerby stepped in to help the women, the migrants used an electroshock weapon to incapacitate him.
Two “foreigners” sexually assaulted two women in downtown Chemnitz. The attack led to a street fight between non-Germans and Germans, several of whom were injured. Police arrested a 19-year-old migrant from Libya for assaulting one of the women. After questioning, he was set free. A Turkish taxi driver attempted to rape an intoxicated 26-year-old female passenger in Heidelberg. A man “presumably of foreign origin” (vermutlich ausländischer Herkunft) groped a young girl in Hammelburg.
And that’s only a small selection of migrant sex crimes committed in Germany on one day: July 10, 2016. Since most sex crimes go unreported, the number of migrant sex crimes actually committed in Germany (and elsewhere in Europe) on an annual basis must be truly staggering.
Here is a Muslim on a YouTube video. Listen to his rant. You’ll be hearing more talk like this soon. He’s not going to kill us quickly and violently with bombs and box cutters, he’s going to kill us slowly and non-violently with birth rates!
“I am telling you honestly, Islam will come to Germany, whether you like it or not. Your daughter will wear a headscarf (hijab). Your son will wear a beard. Okay. And your daughter will marry a bearded man.
We are reproducing faster and faster. You Germans are not getting any children. In the best case, you get two children. We make seven to eight children. Okay, mate? And then we take four wives each, we have 22 children! Maybe you Germans have one child and a dog, huh? And that’s it!
Listen, mate. This is not our fault, it’s your fault. You exploited our countries, colonized our countries.
And so Allah (blessed be his name), Almighty God will make it so that we will conquer you. Not with war, here in Germany, but with birth rates, first and foremost! Secondly, we will marry your daughters! And your daughter will wear a Muslim headscarf!
That’s how it is, mate! Now you can get really mad! I can already see the hate in your eyes!”
If you have time, check out this 4-minute video of a young African bragging about how he and other Black immigrants are going to conquer Europe and impregnate every beautiful White woman they can. “We are taking Europe from the Europeans and they are too stupid to fight back,” he gloats. (0.30). “They are going to pay us to conquer them and take their land.” (1.20). He adds with a smile, “What I look forward to most is the destruction of European womanhood.” (1.30).
Talking of the “destruction of European womanhood,” take a quick look at this 1-minute video clip. This will give you an insight into the unimaginable depravities to which German women are now being exposed after the invasion of the migrant body snatchers. Here is a migrant boasting in broken German about the gang rape of a young girl on a bunk bed, a virgin, seven of them jumping her at once. English subtitles:
“Adim switched off the light and f****d her. (0.14) … She cried after that, she couldn’t go any longer. (0.45) … And we, like pigs we spit on her. Sperm and dirt all over her. We really got milked. (0.47) … DUDE, it was a virgin! And we DESTROYED her with seven guys, dude. (0.57).
And so it seems we’re all on board now for a new Europe in which the inhabitants of Africa (population 1.2 billion) will be given every opportunity to relocate to Europe and interbreed with the White women they encounter there, mass-producing in the process a long assembly line of babies that are neither Black nor White but some intermediate shade of color. Add to this multicultural brew the seething masses of Asia (4.4 billion) and the pullulating Muslim populations of the world (1.6 billion), and then wave placards saying “Refugees Welcome!” and “Welcome Lovely Humans!”—and what do you have?
Answer: Hell on earth.
I don’t think Orwell foresaw this multicultural superstate. This is something new. All we can be sure of is that this Eurostan—the new European superstate now in the making—will be a multicultural dystopia rife with race wars, gang rapes, cheap foreign labor, widespread unemployment for the dispossessed White minority, bullying bosses, cowed workers, overflowing prisons, fatcat lawyers, psychotic politicians, police state surveillance, fabricated news items, false flag attacks, demoralized families, dysfunctional children, schools for morons, mass suicides, manufactured diseases, promoted perversions, drug addiction, gambling, prostitution, pornography, serial killers on the rampage, and nonstop mindless entertainment for the zombified masses.
It will be a dog-eat-dog world of unimaginable cruelty. A nightmare horrorshow that neither Dante nor Hieronymus Bosch ever anticipated in their wildest dreams. If you’re White and dispossessed in this New Dystopia, you’re a dead man walking. Get ready for the Abolition of the White race.
List of Migrant Sex Crimes committed in Germany: July 20, 2016
A group of men with “Arab roots” (arabischstämmig) sexually assaulted five girls, aged 10 to 14, at a public swimming pool in Kirchheim. The men, all between the ages of 20 and 30, groped the girls and tore off the tops and bottoms of their swimming suits. Mayor Angelika Matt-Heidecker, who said she was “horrified” by the assaults, revealed that she had given the migrants permanent pool passes, free of charge. Local citizens are required to pay €90 ($100) for the same pass.
A “dark skinned” man (dunkelhäutigen Mann) raped a 49-year-old woman inOldenburg. A man “presumably originating from abroad” (mutmaßlich aus dem Ausland stammende Mann) attempted to assault a 17-year-old girl on a bus in Bietigheim-Bissingen. Police say a search for the perpetrator has been “unsuccessful.” Three migrants from Afghanistan sexually assaulted at least eight women at a public swimming pool in Mönchengladbach. A 52-year-old migrant from Afghanistan sexually assaulted a 12-year-old girl at a public swimming pool in Marklohe. A group of “Black Africans” (Schwarzafrikaner) sexually assaulted several women at a public swimming pool in Lörrach.
A 31-year-old asylum seeker from Syria was arrested for sexually assaulting a 17-year-old girl in Regensburg. Four “southern looking” (südländischem Aussehen) men assaulted a woman in Varel. A “Pakistani-looking” man sexually assaulted a 23-year-old woman at a grocery store inLüneburg. A 34-year-old migrant from Iran sexually assaulted a 20-year-old woman on the subway in Munich. A 44-year-old migrant from Sudan sexually assaulted three children between the ages of 13 and 17 at a youth center in Aurich.
I find this catalogue of crimes overwhelming. I have to ask myself: is Angela Merkel raving mad to throw open the gates of Germany to these unruly savages from the Third World? Are the German people themselves suffering from some kind of collective psychosis that compels them to welcome their own race killers with open arms? It would seem so.
Militant Islam is a threat to liberty
We need to keep clearly in mind the distinctions between race and religion, religion and fanaticism. Islam is a religion. It has nothing to do with race. The problem we have is with fanatical Muslims on religious grounds. That problem has to be dealt with in those terms.
Making these distinctions did not save me from abuse by various regressive leftists who asserted — like the foreign editor of The Age, Maher Mughrabi — that the distinctions I had made were a lot of nonsense and that “of course” criticism of Islam is “racist”.
One lecturer in critical thinking at the University of Sydney, no less, denounced me on Twitter as a highbrow version of neo-nazi racists, a photo of whom accompanied his text.
Such deeply confused polemics throw into high relief how important it is to hammer these distinctions into our public and political consciousness so that they set the terms of the debate. For if we are to avoid serious social conflict over the challenge posed to Western secular society by aggressive Islam, it would be in everyone’s interest to understand that the issue is, indeed, one of religion and not one of race.
Religious concerns have underpinned tentative moves in the US and the EU to curtail massive spending by Saudi Arabia on building Wahhabi Islamist infrastructure in the West. Based on principles of toleration hammered out since the 17th century — notably in John Locke’s Letter Concerning Toleration of 1689 — all religions are allowed to worship unmolested. This is not so in Saudi Arabia. There, no religion other than Wahhabi Sunni Islam is permitted.
During the past few decades, the Saudi regime has spent a staggering $100 billion to build Wahhabi mosques, madrassas and other facilities around the world. They are used to propagate a religious culture that is singularly intolerant and reactionary.
Belatedly and cautiously, moves are afoot to curtail the influx of Saudi money to fund such activities. Note that the target here is the Wahhabi Sunni sect of Islam. It is not Arabs and least of all Arabs who do not subscribe to this particular religious sect.
As Daniel Pipes, of the Middle East Forum, pointed out recently, “The Saudis have been arrogantly indiscreet about spending to promote Wahhabism.” The extremist literature provided to the public by Saudi-funded institutions was described more than a decade ago, in a Freedom House report, as “a grave threat to non-Muslims and to the Muslim community itself”. Riyadh also has pumped money into the Council on American-Islamic Relations, “the most aggressive and effective Islamist organisation in the United States”.
This pattern of Saudi funding and the widespread disturbances being caused by Muslim fanatics directly raise the issues pondered by Locke more than 300 years ago when he sought to articulate what were to become, most notably in the US, broadbased principles of religious toleration: the relationship between the freedom to worship and the keeping of the civil peace.
“If solemn assemblies, observations of festivals, public worship be permitted to any one” religious sect, Locke wrote, meaning to Anglicans in England in the first instance, “all these things ought to be permitted to the Presbyterians, Independents, Anabaptists, Arminians, Quakers, and others, with the same liberty”. He was, in other words, seeking liberty for religious dissenters. He added, however, “if we may openly speak the truth, and as becomes one man to another, neither Pagan nor Mahometan, nor Jew, ought to be excluded from the civil rights of the commonwealth because of his religion.
“The Gospel commands no such thing,” he argued, “and the commonwealth, which embraces indifferently all men that are honest, peaceable, and industrious, requires it not”. He was inclined, however, to draw the line at the Catholic religion, which he saw as answerable to a foreign principality — the papacy — and especially given to inciting civil tumults and religious strife. That objection was overcome in time. It pertains, however, in our time, to various fanatical strands within Islam and must be dealt with.
The crux of the matter is that militant Islam poses a direct and deliberate threat to any secular liberal constitution. We must organise our defences and push back on a coherent and principled basis. When the regressive Left insists that no such defence is warranted and that any attempts to organise it are “racist”, it is not only being intellectually incoherent, it is setting up a situation in which the rise of Islam will inevitably be met by illiberal reactions. No one should want to see that happen.
Liberal democratic norms, properly understood, are not about treating any and every religion as self-contained and beyond criticism. They are about insisting that those who embrace religious beliefs, if they wish to be accepted within the liberal social order, must accept that their beliefs — often incomprehensible or rebarbative to others — are a private matter and must not be practised or propagated in such a way as to disturb the common peace.
Islam, as it is widely practised and propagated in our time, does not meet these criteria sufficiently to leave the adherents of other religions or no religion at all comfortable with how things are unfolding. Wahhabi Islam, Iranian Shia Islam, the Islam of numerous militant sects in Africa, the Middle East and Asia are incompatible with liberal norms.
These are not Arminians, Quakers or Presbyterians, or even Catholics. They seek violent theocratic revolution in the name of reactionary values. We do not owe them any favours or concessions. It is, on the contrary, they who must bow to the principles of toleration, or be excluded from its benefits.
The Death Of The First Amendment for Ordinary Americans
One of the most important issues driving the populist – conservative coalition supporting Donald Trump is the well-justified feeling that constitutional liberty – particularly First Amendment freedom of speech and thought – are being stripped from ordinary Americans by a self-appointed elite political correctness police force.
And that suddenly saying something patriotic like you believe in American exceptionalism or that immigrants should assimilate and become Americans can get you fired, accused of being a racist and publicly shunned.
First AmendmentAnd this new elitist imposed speech code is applied with particular vitriol by the immigration and race-based privileges lobby.
An example of this vitriol recently surfaced when legendary football coach Lou Holtz was unceremoniously disinvited from making a speech at Cathedral High School in El Paso, Texas.
Holtz’s transgression was telling luncheon guests at a Republican National Convention event for Donald Trump, “I don’t want to speak your language, I don’t want to celebrate your holidays, I sure as hell don’t want to cheer for your soccer team.”
The campaign against Holtz was led (irony alert) by the El Paso Times newspaper, a beneficiary of the very First Amendment protections it lobbied to deprive Coach Holtz of.
An editorial by the El Paso Times applied pressure on the Cathedral alumni when it stated that the high school’s leaders “made an unfortunate decision” by picking Holtz to speak at the gathering geared to raise funds for future scholarships. “Holtz is a highly successful football coach, but his hateful words last month run counter to many of the principles that have made Cathedral such an important part of the El Paso community,” the paper stated.
This is an astonishing lowering of the standard for what constitutes “hate” to the point that loving one’s country and culture and believing in the American exceptionalism that inspired America’s leaders from John Winthrop to Ronald Reagan now constitutes “hate.”
Or take the case of Diane Amoratis, fired from Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in Philadelphia, who posted a heated Facebook post in support of the police and calling out the Soros-funded Black Lives Matter movement for encouraging rioting and civil disorder.
Ms. Amoratis was on her personal Facebook page, not speaking for the hospital, and she chose language that we would not use in an article on CHQ for part of her post, but no F-bombs, no N words and certainly nothing that approaches the race-based hate against white people spewing from BLM.
But she posted these “triggering” words sure to get anyone who says them branded as a racist, “I am white and proud to be white!! White lives matter!!!! Police officers lives matter!!!”
We wouldn’t have chosen the same words Ms. Amoratis chose, but we get her frustration and especially with the idea that being white and proud is apparently now hate.
However, it is OK to be black and promote the Far-Left concept of “White Crimes” that in radical construction means anyone of any race, creed, nationality, color, sex, or sexual preference who embraces Western Enlightenment beliefs, such a traditional American values and capitalism, beliefs which to the radical Left are irredeemably evil and thus anyone who aligns with them is “white” in spirit and thus equally guilty of “White Crimes.”
That the Far Left can attack with impunity anyone for being “White,” but a white person who disparages rioters gets fired for a private Facebook post makes no sense to ordinary man-on-the-street Americans.
But it makes perfect sense if you buy Hillary Clinton’s definition of what makes America great.
The “values” that Mrs. Clinton thinks made this country great?
Embrace of Open Borders and Unlimited Immigration
Rejection of American Exceptionalism
According to Mrs. Clinton, if you reject multi-culturalism and political correctness and favor protection of American national sovereignty and American exceptionalism then you are a dangerous alt-right “extremist” who should be barred from polite society and run out of politics.
Those looking to explain Donald Trump’s populist support and the rise of the #AltRight need look no further than firings and disinvitations like these to understand the outrage at the double of standard of what constitutes “hate” and the legitimate feeling of ordinary Americans that they are being marginalized in their own country.
Denial of religious motive does not alter delusional foundation
When Smail Ayad, a French citizen of North African descent fatally stabbed Mia Ayliffe-Chung -- and Tom Jackson who died later -- to the now-familiar Muslim refrain Allahu akbar (God is great), it was interesting to see how quick the police and others were to deny that the attack could have had a religious motive.
Ayad, it seems, had been obsessed with Ayliffe-Chung. Quite possibly he was mad, and it is also possible that he was under the influence of drugs.
But even if all this is so, it does not follow that religious belief played no part in his actions. The causes of human behaviour and its motives are often, indeed usually, mixed.
It is simple-minded to suppose that if he were obsessed with his victim, or under the influence of some drug or other, religion considerations could not have entered his mind as he killed. A drunken murderer is not the less motivated by jealousy because he is drunk.
It is well-known that delusion often takes on the cultural flavour or obsessions of the day. There are no more Napoleons in psychiatric hospitals because Bonapartism is dead, not because delusion has been conquered. I once had two Haile Selassies under my care in the same hospital ward; Rastafarianism was then part of the zeitgeist.
Given the prominence of Islamist notions today, it would hardly be surprising if madmen took it up as a theme of their madness (Islamism seems half-mad, or at least severely irrational, to most of us to begin with). Indeed, it would be surprising if they did not.
The almost immediate denial that Smail Ayad could have had any religious thought in mind as he shouted 'God is great' -- on the grounds he didn't have a Koran with him -- smacks very strongly of whistling in the wind.
Political correctness is most pervasive in universities and colleges but I rarely report the incidents concerned here as I have a separate blog for educational matters.
American "liberals" often deny being Leftists and say that they are very different from the Communist rulers of other countries. The only real difference, however, is how much power they have. In America, their power is limited by democracy. To see what they WOULD be like with more power, look at where they ARE already very powerful: in America's educational system -- particularly in the universities and colleges. They show there the same respect for free-speech and political diversity that Stalin did: None. So look to the colleges to see what the whole country would be like if "liberals" had their way. It would be a dictatorship.
For more postings from me, see TONGUE-TIED, GREENIE WATCH, EDUCATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL, FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC, AUSTRALIAN POLITICS and DISSECTING LEFTISM. My Home Pages are here or here or here. Email me (John Ray) here.