Sunday, March 12, 2017

California bill gives carte blanche for Leftist-run agencies to take children from their parents

The report below by Tim Bolen may seem alarmist to anyone who has read the bill but its sheer vagueness is the problem with the bill.  It clearly does give the State a responsibility for ensuring all sorts of "rights" for children and we know how Leftist bureaucrats can interpret vague words to suit their own ends. 

There have been many expressions of alarm from conservatives about the bill and Snopes had endeavoured to debunk the concerns.  All Snopes could find to say was that there was nothing specific in the bill, which we all knew anyway. 

There is a detailed dissection of the bill here.  In summary, there is just way to much leeway in the bill for Leftist social workers to apply it in oppressive ways

Liberal Democrats have moved to the next step in their efforts to control all of humanity, cancelling the US Constitution in a program to create a one-world order – by attempting to take control of California children away from their parents.

The primary effort is called Senate Bill 18, falsely identified as a “Children’s Rights” bill.  It gives the State of California  unlimited, ultimate, authority over children.

The bill is so vague it assigns that same body the power to decide, day-by-day, about children’s Education, Healthcare, and Emotional well-being – an absolutely insane concept.  The Democrats are planning surprise “home inspections.”

The sponsor of the bill, so-called Common Sense Media, raises serious red flags with parents.  As BolenReport Author Karri Lewis questioned in an earlier article “Just WHO IS Sponsoring California State Senator Richard Pan’s Destruction of Parental Rights?”   What she asked was:

“Why on earth would Common Sense Media, a supposedly family friendly company, support the stealing of parental rights by the state of California via Senator Richard Pan?”

In another article Karri points out that Common Sense Media, on one of their web pages promotes, and supports, an organization called “kidzworld.”  The entire excerpt text from Karri’s article on this is printed at the bottom of this page.

Surprise home inspections, by progressive liberal activists, will have the power to take the children, immediately, to a Child Protective Services (CPS) facility should they find what they determine, in the moment, to be contrary to THEIR version of what a child should be exposed to.

As we know, liberal Democrats OFFICIALLY DESPISE family units made up of heterosexual couples and children.

A “Home Inspection” of  NORMAL people’s dwellings conducted by teams similar to those we see in their “demonstrations” would not be productive.

Liberal Democrats also despise the idea of a Judeo/Christian ethic and could be counted on, during a “Home Inspection” to be appalled to find that a man and woman couple slept in the same bed.  A gun in the house would send the inspectors into an eppilectic seizure. Signs of Christianity or Judaism on the walls would cause those inspectors to drool uncontrollably.

If inspectors found, for instance, that little boys’ rooms contained baseball equipment, swords, toy guns, and war game videos instead of dolls, tea sets, make-up, and booklets on sex change operations, the CPS process might well suddenly accelerate.


Ann Coulter:‘Immigrant Privilege’ Drives Child Rape Epidemic

Before breathing a sigh of relief that, unlike Western Europe, we don’t have Muslim rapists pouring into our country, recall that we have Mexican rapists pouring into our country.

Almost all peasant cultures are brimming with rapists, pederasts and child abusers. Latin America just happens to be the peasant culture closest to the United States, while the Muslims are closest to Europe.

According to North Carolinians for Immigration Reform and Enforcement, immigrants commit hundreds of sex crimes against children in North Carolina every month — 350 in the month of April 2014, 299 in May, and more than 400 in August and September. More than 90 percent of the perpetrators are Hispanic.

They aren’t even counting legal immigrants. Aren’t those worse? Only certain Republicans get excited about the difference between legal and illegal immigrants. The rest of America is trying to understand the point of the last 40 years of legal immigration. Why was this necessary?

Below is a very short excerpt from a few days in November 2013. As Stalin is supposed to have said, sometimes quantity has a quality all its own.

— Abundez, Jose, Juan (11/12/2013): Felony Sex Offense — Parental Role

— Aguilar-Sandoval, Jersson, Iss (11/21/2013): Felony First Degree Sexual Offense; Felony First Degree Rape; Felony First Degree Kidnapping

— Aguilar, Rafael (11/04/2013): Felony Indecent Liberties With Child

— Aguilar, Rigoberto, Castellano (11/04/2013): Felony First Degree Rape; Felony Indecent Liberties With Child; Felony Stat Rape/Sex Offn Def>4-<6yr br="">
(Note: That’s sex with a child between 4 and 6 years old.)

— Manzano, Gustavo, Adolfo (11/20/2013): Felony Indecent Liberties With Child; Felony Rape of Child

— Monje, Alcides, Aguilar (11/18/2013): Felony Stat Rape/Sex Offn Def >=6yr; Felony Indecent Liberties With Child, 13.

The list, for a single month in a single state, goes on in the same vein through 87 separate offenders. When not providing North Carolina meatpackers with cheap labor, immigrant workers seem to spend all their time raping little girls.

To be fair, there are also Asian names, such as Y’Hon Nie (Indecent Liberties With Child, First Degree Sex Offense-Child, Second Degree Sexual Offense); and David Vo Minh (First Degree Sex Offense-Child, Indecent Liberties With Child).

North Carolina’s cheap labor advocates better be paying Sen. Thom Tillis well. It sure isn’t the average North Carolinian demanding that he shill for amnesty. Illegal immigration alone costs North Carolina taxpayers billions of dollars per year.

Our nation’s epitaph, with a photo of Sen. Tillis, could be: “We built a powerful economic engine that attracted people, but then some businessmen saw their chance to screw the country and make a pile for themselves. Let’s bring in low-wage workers so we can externalize our costs to the taxpayer!”

Except North Carolina’s businesses aren’t just externalizing their costs to the taxpayers. They’re externalizing their costs to little girls.

The reason websites like North Carolinians for Immigration Reform and Enforcement are so important is that the government and the media hide immigrant crime from the public.

They cite bogus studies that compare immigrants to America’s criminal class. (We didn’t want immigrants who are only slightly less criminal than our worst inner cities.)

Or they announce their impressionistic conclusions. (I heard about a crime in Montana — that state must have a lot of crime, is not a scientific way to argue.)

Or they refuse to count any criminal without an ICE detainer against him as an immigrant, at all. (Is the court translator a hint that the defendant isn’t a 10th-generation American?)

The way to determine how many immigrants are committing crime is to count them. Why does the government refuse to do this?

The number of immigrants in prison would be a good start, but that’s only the tip of the iceberg.

Immigrant criminals flee back to their own countries after arrest. Prosecutors deport illegals rather than imprison them — and then the illegals come right back. Some George Soros-inspired prosecutors allow illegals to plea guilty to a minor offense, to prevent them from being deported.

To get the full picture, government investigators will need to talk to crime victims, police and prosecutors, too.

And we want honesty — not studies that count anchor babies and second-generation immigrants as “the native population.”

The media is the government’s co-conspirator in hiding immigrant crime. I have approximately 1,000 examples of media subterfuges on immigrant crime in Adios, America! The Left’s Plan to Turn Our Country Into a Third World Hellhole.

Here are a few recent examples from Sen. Tillis’ North Carolina.

Headline: “Burke County man convicted of raping 13-year-old girl,” Charlotte Observer, Feb. 1, 2017 (Ricardo Solis Garcia — an illegal whom Mexico refused to take back);

Headline: “Burlington man charged with child rape,” The Times News, Jan. 19, 2017 (Felipe Samuel Rivera Rodriguez);

Headline: “Angier man accused of having sex with 14-year-old girl,” The Fayetteville Observer, Aug. 29, 2016 (Estevan Roberto Silva).

NOTE TO READERS: The North Carolina Estevan Roberto Silva — sex with a 14-year-old girl — should not be confused with the Texas Esteban Villa Silva — sex with a 12-year-old girl about 60 times — or the Alabama Esteban Silva Jr. — 42-year-old man convicted of sex with a 12-year-old girl. All these child rapes were revealed in coded headlines like “Man pleads to sexual relationship with girl.”

Other informative North Carolina headlines:

Headline: “Man, 42, arrested for sexual offense with girl under 13” (Carlos Gumercindo Crus);

Headline: “Man charged with sexual assault of a minor” (Jose Freddy Ambrosio-Gorgonio);

Headline: Man Pleads Guilty in Child Rape Case (Luis Perez-Valencia).

It’s too relentless to be a coincidence.

There have been more stories in the American media about a rape by white lacrosse players that didn’t happen than about thousands of child rapes in North Carolina that did.

I’m pretty sure our media is opposed to rape. But evidently, not as opposed as they are to America.


UK: Hands up if you’re worried about being mown down, blown up or axed to death by a white, right wing nutter (unless, of course, you’re the Home Office). Thought not

One of the things that surprises me on an almost weekly basis, is how axe, machete, knife and bomb attacks against nationals across Europe are responded to by anti-terror squads even though they are not, apparently, terror.

We are categorically told: this was not a terror attack.

And as if to sugar-coat our daily dose of multiculturalism, we hear surprisingly quickly if the attacker came from anywhere that isn't a mainly Muslim country.

The authorities were virtually falling over themselves to report the lorry in the Christmas attack was licensed to a Polish driver. Only to discover, shortly afterwards, that he had been murdered in his cab by the Muslim terrorist at the wheel.

It was a long time before the crazed Dusseldorf axe attacker from last night could be named.

Eye-witness accounts describing him in the German newspapers as southern-looking (which translates as Mediterranean / dark-skinned) were quickly glossed over and replaced with a much more reassuring 'Yugoslavian'. A country which doesn’t even exist!

Does anyone remember what that conflict in Yugoslavia was all about? Religion wasn’t it?

Finally we find out that’s he’s one ‘Fatmir H’ from 95% Muslim Kosovo. Hmmm.

But he apparently has severe mental issues, and the attack as ‘nothing to do with terror’. So that’s all right then.

It’s a consistent messaging that we have become so used to that we've learned to take shortcuts to aid our own understanding.

If we are not given a name for a violent perpetrator, we can assume it's not Sven.

If we are not told the country of birth, it’s pretty much guaranteed to be on the list Donald Trump has wisely banned from the States.

And if we are eventually told the name and nationality, we can safely assume suddenly mental issues will be front and centre. Or at the very least he will be a wolf. And alone.

(What has always surprised me is how individuals with genuine mental illness have never complained about being bracketed together with the sort of people who shout a few religious words and then try to axe off the arm of a thirteen-year-old at a bus stop.)

Now it appears the Home Office is keen to push this narrative, one step further by shouting about the fact white people are scary too. If not worse. Their headline statistics released yesterday assert one in three terror suspects arrested in Britain last year was white.

Did you get that? One in three?

Less numerate minds might be looking around at their neighbours thinking one in three of them could be a terrorist. Next-door-but-one could be looking to machete you in the night. White van man over the road might be concealing some hard-core Semtex under his fluoro-vest.

But let’s think about this a bit. If one-third of terror suspects arrested were white, then two-thirds were not.

And the two-thirds who identify as non-white make up just 10% of the censored UK population. (As for the non-censored lot who prefer not to be counted, I will leave you to draw your own conclusions.) So two-thirds of all terror suspects arrested are from just ten percent, a tiny fraction, of our population. The non-white population.

That is the bigger story. But there is a bigger question.

Why is the Home Office so desperate to make white people the fear? Why the inference that the rise in the far right is just as big a threat as Islamic extremism, when all evidence is to the contrary?

And why is so much resource being thrown at domestic terror (where there are no links to either Northern Ireland-related or international terrorism), resulting in the arrest of just 35 domestic ‘terror suspects’, when their figures show a 30% fall in the use of counter-terrorism powers at the UK border (where just 19,355 people were 'stopped and examined' at airports and seaports)?

This is madness. An insane waste of resource to satisfy politically correct quotas.

We are focussing effort and energy on Fat Joe from the darts club who was alleged to have left a pack of bacon from the Co-op outside a mosque, and not on borders and airports where a reported 200 migrants a day are coming into our country -- in the back of a van -- no doubt many of them from places Thump has banned from America.

Our top terror expert in the UK, David Anderson QC, is equally keen to force this agenda in the face of statistical truths: 'Extreme right-wing ideology can be just as murderous as its Islamist equivalent'; he said.

'Increasingly, right-wing extremists such as Thomas Mair, the killer of Jo Cox MP, feed off the tension [caused by Islamist extremism] to plan violence of their own'

I’d argue the tensions around Jo Cox’s death were not of the making of Islamic extremists, but by liberal extremists. The far left. A group which, according to the media, does not exist. And a group who do not identify as far-left, but act that way all the same.

I would assert that there are powerful forces lobbying the government for the far-right to be in the spotlight at all times.

I wonder if it is just a coincidence the husband of Jo Cox, endlessly and relentlessly pushed across the BBC, was a senior political adviser to Gordon Brown and well connected inside Parliament.

I am not sure he is driven by grief alone. I think he is still a man with a political mission, determined to own hope and make white Brexiteers the custodians of hate.

No one is arguing her murder was not an appalling act. But as the ONLY fatal attack in the UK that is remotely attributable to the right-wing, why are we suddenly being asked to believe that terrorism by the right is on a par with the brutal acts of ISIS?

I listed the suspected terror attacks in Germany this year in a tweet:

And immediately those following the multi-cultural script told me 12,000 people are killed by guns in America each year. Or this was not relevant to UK news. Or the perpetrators country of origin was not relevant. Or I am racist.

This is the far left at work. They are the ones promoted across the BBC trying to own ‘hope’ when they are actually the biggest perpetrators of a new brand accepted form of ‘hate’.

And they are as delusional as the Dusseldorf axeman.


White men an 'endangered species' on boards, chairman of British supermarket chain claims

The chairman of Tesco has claimed that white men have become an “endangered species” on the boards of British companies amid the push to increase diversity in business.

In comments that are likely to court controversy, John Allan suggested it was becoming harder for men to become non-executive directors of firms.

“If you are female and from an ethnic background and preferably both then you are in an extremely propitious period,” the supermarket group’s chairman said at a panel discussion about how to become a non-exec, at Retail Week Live.

“For a thousand years men have got most of these jobs, the pendulum has swung very significantly the other way now and will do for the foreseeable future I think.

“If you are a white male – tough – you are an endangered species and you are going to have to work twice as hard .”

It comes as companies face mounting pressure to do more to increase the proportion of women and candidates from ethnic minorities on their boards, to better reflect the changing face of British society.

All 11 members of Tesco’s board are white and it comprises just three women. Two of its female non-execs - Alison Platt and Lindsey Pownall - joined the supermarket giant last year.



Political correctness is most pervasive in universities and colleges but I rarely report the  incidents concerned here as I have a separate blog for educational matters.

American "liberals" often deny being Leftists and say that they are very different from the Communist rulers of  other countries.  The only real difference, however, is how much power they have.  In America, their power is limited by democracy.  To see what they WOULD be like with more power, look at where they ARE already  very powerful: in America's educational system -- particularly in the universities and colleges.  They show there the same respect for free-speech and political diversity that Stalin did:  None.  So look to the colleges to see  what the whole country would be like if "liberals" had their way.  It would be a dictatorship.

For more postings from me, see TONGUE-TIED, GREENIE WATCH,   EDUCATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL, AUSTRALIAN POLITICS and  DISSECTING LEFTISM.   My Home Pages are here or   here or   here.  Email me (John Ray) here


No comments: