Traditional Women are Often Chicken Frying Snakes in Disguise
The article below by an ethnic lady is most unusual. What she describes probably happens within her own society of origin and maybe it happens in our society too -- among the less educated, perhaps
"Gold-diggers" are a known female phenomenon in a our society. I have met a few. So what the author describes is partly familiar. Using a pretence of extreme femininity as part of that is a somewhat novel idea, though
She will use her Garlic Mashed Potatoes and Good Sex to Manipulate the Dizzy Man of her Choosing
Dating is hard enough, but you should at least know who you’re dating, and who they really are. Traditional gender roles have truly confused a lot of people. They have left them believing that duties are who someone is inside, and duty really means nothing. There are men, and in my observation young men being the majority, that often believe a woman performing “traditional wifely duties” (cooking, cleaning, consistent sex, silence, forgiveness, etc.) is a “good woman”. That isn’t necessarily the case. What is this woman like? What is her true character. A fascination with traditional gender roles often leads young men, and anyone else engaging in love and relationships, astray.
Does it really matter that the person you’re dating is a liar? No, really, have you noticed that she lies her ass off, or were you too busy eating her homecooked meals? Did you possibly pass over a sweet honest girl who occasionally burns the macaroni and cheese just to date a snake that keeps a clean house and hot pot of grits and cheese on the stove? Did you ignore a kind girl with a heart of gold for a “loyal” woman who smiles in your face but quietly fucks your friends when you are out of town? I know men who have done it. They allowed the shallow to overshadow the deep, the real, the truth.
Character often falls way low on the list when sexism and male entitlement are a man’s primary lens for viewing women, and the more sexist, misogynistic, and entitled the man, the less likely he is to notice the character of the woman he’s courting. He wants to feel powerful, “masculine”, in control, dominant, special, like a King of sorts. A woman who understands this, a woman who has been taught this from youth, a woman who may very well be of piss-poor character, will exploit this. She will file “traditional wife skills” under “feminine wiles” and use those feminine wiles to facilitate a passive-aggressive “capture” of a blind man who actually believes he is in control.
She will use her garlic mashed potatoes and gravy to distract him from the lies she tells, the business of his she shares with friends and associates who never even asked. She will give him all the sex he can and cannot handle, though she doesn’t even enjoy it (but pretends to), and may be secretly sleeping with someone else on the side … just to ensure he continues to bring his paycheck home. That is the sort of “opportunity” that “traditional gender roles” often provide the sinister. Sometimes, poor character finds a great place to hide in “traditional gender roles”. This is why misogyny, sexism, and sometimes, even religion, can be dangerous.
People are people. They are full, complex, and complete. They are evolving, and unique. They have character and layers. We are not just “archetypes”. No one is simply, “an archetype”, and it is understanding this truth that allows us to move forward in relationships with not one, but both eyes wide open. Who is this person? What are their likes? What do they love? What is their definition of friendship? When you find the right person, a good person, male, female or non-binary, you are lucky, blessed, favored.
A good person can learn to cook, provide, clean, protect, have more sex, listen, have fun, or whatever will make their partner happy. They are honest, pure, and excited to be in a loving relationship. They aren’t some creepy Stepford imitating biblical standards of gender perfection for kudos, pats on the back, or to hide all of the betrayals they are levying at their significant other. They are trustworthy, trusting, kind, thoughtful, considerate, loving, healthy, and well-meaning before anything else.
Use your own mind to choose your partner, because choosing a partner based on gender roles, tradition, and what “they” say may actually pave your way to a long-term relationship with a virtual stranger … who makes great pot roast.
****************************************************
Court Orders Release of True the Vote Leaders From Jail
Two leaders of the election integrity group True the Vote were released from jail after an appeals court overruled a judge’s order that they be detained for contempt of court.
Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips were ordered released by a panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit late on Nov. 6.
“IT IS ORDERED that Petitioners’ opposed motion for release from detention is GRANTED pending further order of this court,” the panel said in the order, which was obtained by The Epoch Times.
The panel consisted of Circuit Judges Catharina Haynes, a George W. Bush appointee; Kurt Engelhardt, a Donald Trump appointee; and Andrew Oldham, a Trump appointee.
Engelbrecht and Phillips were released on Nov. 7.
Engelbrecht and Phillips were sent to jail on Oct. 31 by U.S. District Judge Kenneth Hoyt, a Reagan appointee, who found them in contempt of court for not revealing the identities of people who allegedly accessed information from Konnech, a Michigan-based election management software company whose founder was recently arrested for allegedly stealing poll worker data and hosting the information on servers in China.
The order for confinement was to be in place until the defendants “fully comply” with an order that they reveal certain information, including the identities, Hoyt said.
Engelbrecht and Phillips say they passed on information that was legally obtained from Konnech to the FBI. One of their attorneys identified one of the individuals in question, Mike Hasson, during an October hearing. But they have declined to share the name of the second person. Both the individuals are FBI informants, Phillips asserted during one hearing.
“Those who thought that imprisoning Gregg and I would weaken our resolve have gravely miscalculated. It is stronger than ever,” Engelbrecht said in a statement. “The right to free and fair elections without interference is more important than our own discomforts and even this detention, now reversed by a higher court.
“We are profoundly grateful for that. We will continue to protect and defend those who do the vital work of election integrity, and we will make sure that their findings become a matter of public record.”
The contempt order came after Konnech sued True the Vote and its founders for defamation.
Hoyt entered a temporary restraining order against the defendants, ordering them to return all property and data to Konnech and identify people who were involved in accessing the company’s computers.
In their filing for release, Engelbrecht and Phillips said that Hoyt’s confinement order “represents a clear abuse of discretion and a manifest miscarriage of justice.”
“Petitioners pray that this Court enter an Order releasing them from the district court’s draconian order of detention for refusing to identify a federal confidential informant in open court whose identity in any event has no bearing on the merits of this defamation case hinging on competing accounts of alleged historical events,” they added.
The pair also said that they never possessed or controlled the information in question. Phillips said Engelbrecht doesn’t know the name that he is withholding and that, if the name were revealed, the person’s life would “be jeopardized by border drug and smuggling cartels.”
In its opposition to the petition, Konnech said that the True the Vote founders were trying to “strip the District Court of its contempt power” and that they “have no one but themselves to blame for their confinement” after defying Hoyt’s order.
Lawyers for the firm said, “Petitioners’ imprisonment is not an emergency especially in this case where the Petitioners are contemnors and recalcitrant witnesses who hold the keys to the jailhouse, and can free themselves immediately upon purging their contempt.”
https://www.theepochtimes.com/court-orders-true-the-vote-leaders-released-from-jail_4846717.html
***************************************************Feminist Naomi Wolf is a vaccine skeptic
She is urging women to vote against those who promoted the vaccines. Excerpt only below
When I spoke to a crowd of thousands at the Defeat the Mandates rally in LA, I warned the mandate-driving leaders and the Pharma executives: “You hurt our kids,” and that they had no idea what it would be like to be on the receiving end of the rage of thousands of mothers. I got a visceral roar of affirmation from the women in the crowd, even louder than the noise from the men. The video, interestingly, is hard to find now online.
Mine was not a partisan statement, and I have no idea the party affiliation of the women who reacted with that brutal lioness-roar of affirmation.
We were all, at that moment, a de facto Party of Moms.
Furious mothers have never before been a political force, but by God, they are now.
If you are a mom, or stepmom, vote like a mom or stepmom on Tuesday.
Who was most hurt by forced mRNA injections?
Women.
Dr Robert Chandler, of the WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers, found that the lipid nanoparticles remain in the ovaries. He also found that women sustained 72 per cent of the adverse events, compared to men, and that 16 per cent of these adverse events were “reproductive disorders” (Pfizer’s own phrase) versus the less than one per cent of reproductive disorders sustained by men.
The mRNA vaccines, that were forced on women (the majority of the US population) by a male President, destroyed American women’s fertility at a scale we are only now beginning to grasp; one that is monumental.
When I tried to warn US women (accurately) that mRNA injections were damaging women’s menstrual cycles, I was deplatformed and smeared. Carol Crawford of the CDC (no doubt a “feminist”), Dr Rochelle Walensky of the CDC (“feminist”) and Andy Slavitt of the “feminist” White House, colluded with Twitter and Facebook to smear and deplatform me as well as others, all trying to raise alarms regarding the mRNA vaccine’s threats to women’s and human health.
(Sheryl Sandberg, then COO of Facebook, wrote a book about women’s empowerment, Lean In: Women, Work and the Will to Lead. I had supported her in a column of mine at Project Syndicate, when her book faced criticism. Her organization, LeanIn.org, promotes women’s empowerment “circles.” Later, at her request, I went to visit her on the Facebook campus.
Our sisterhood moment did not last long.
Throughout 2021 and into 2022, I was in repeated, direct contact with Sandberg by email seeking without results to get back onto my Facebook fan page, with its 150,000 followers, to report damage of mRNA vaccines to women’s reproductive health, and other information I was uncovering regarding women’s and babies’ health issues. Little did I know, when she kept sidestepping my requests to regain my platform, that for all of those months, her company was meeting regularly with the White House and CDC to keep folks like me, and indeed me specifically, out.
By running a company that colluded with the White House and CDC to censor information about menstrual and reproductive harms to women, and about mortal danger to fetuses and babies, Sandberg was unfortunately “leaning in” to an American and global genocide. But hey, she still owns 1.5 million shares of the company, worth $290 million, so women’s and babies’ health be damned.
Sheryl Sandberg. Big Dem supporter. Famous “feminist.”)
By the Biden administration silencing critics—with the latest America First Legal FOIA release, we see that this silencing goes up to the level of DHS—they and their tech company allies ensured that millions of American women would suffer debilitatingly life-changing menses, and that American women too would sustain the level of miscarriages and neonatal deaths that we are seeing worldwide.
So a bitter irony is now inherent in our historical moment, in our choice on Tuesday.
The Left is always claiming that the Right wants to “Get into my uterus,” so, RNC, “Stay out of my uterus.”
And the DNC is continually maintaining, in these final days before Tuesday, that Democrats alone are the champions of your uterus.
The DNC bases its appeal to women, of course, on protecting women’s right to abortion.
But we must now face the fact that the DNC gives not two f—ks , as the evidence emerging now proves, for your right to have a healthy, living baby.
It is very, very bad to grab women by the pussy without their consent.
But it is also very, very bad to destroy women’s ovaries and uteruses, and to poison their breast milk, without their consent, and to force them to submit to taking into their bodies as a “medicine,” a substance that can kill their babies in utero or soon after birth.
By ignoring this damage done on its watch to women and babies, the Left loses its historical claim to be the defender of women’s bodies and of their choices about their bodies.
Who actually, most recently, hurt and invaded your uterus with malice aforethought? It is the people currently in power.
Lipid nanoparticles traverse every membrane in the human body, including the uterus and in pregnant women, the placenta.
Dr James Thorp, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist, found that the lipid nanoparticles of the mRNA vaccine traverse the placenta and create a netting of calcifications that weaken it.
Babies of mRNA-vaccinated women are being delivered early, as the placentas of many vaccinated women do not have the integrity to bring a baby safely to term. Dr Thorp reports that many babies of vaccinated moms are being born with chromosomal abnormalities or physical malformations.
That is a women’s issue.
President Biden and Dr Rochelle Walensky and Andy Slavitt and Governor Gretchen Whitmer and Governor Kathy Hochul (the latter both “feminists”) were fine running this risk with your body, your ovaries, your breast milk, your uterus, your fetus, your baby.
https://www.independent.org/news/article.asp?id=14333&omhide=true&trk=rm
************************************************BOYS as young as 12 might be asked if they are PREGNANT in latest woke language storm to engulf British health service
Boys as young as 12 face being asked if they are pregnant in the latest woke language storm to engulf the NHS.
A poster on the walls of a hospital in Scotland also refers to biological women and girls as 'people with internal reproductive organs'.
Experts said the messaging was 'dreadful' and failed the basic principles of clear health communication and biology.
The poster at NHS Tayside says anyone aged between 12 and 55 should be asked if they are pregnant 'irrespective of gender' before undergoing examinations where they are exposed to radiation.
A picture of the poster, uploaded to Twitter, reads: 'Irrespective of your gender you may be asked to complete a form about pregnancy before some examinations.
The poster makes no mention of women, girls or females of any kind in regard to the risk of undergoing a scan while pregnant.
Instead, it classifies these patients as 'people who have internal reproductive organs'.
'Only people who have internal reproductive organs have the ability to become pregnant,' it reads. 'We check this with each individual, and conduct a pregnancy check accordingly.'
NHS Tayside said the poster followed best practise guidelines but was being trialled at only a few sites before being rolled out across the organisation.
Stella O'Malley, psychotherapist and founder of campaign group Genspect, said the poster was unfit for purpose.
'Over-the-top and elaborate efforts to be inclusive for certain groups often end up excluding other groups,' she said.
'The NHS should revert to simple and clear language if they want to help the most people possible.
'This purpose of this poster is to keep patients safe from harm by warning pregnant females that there are dangers in exposing themselves to certain treatments.
'But this poster is not fit for purpose because it is pretty incomprehensible.
'People who do not speak fluent English will find it difficult to understand this poster. I wonder who decided that their needs were deemed less important?'
Ms O'Malley also said she was worried about the impact of these question on boys undergoing serious medical treatment.
'We're often at our lowest ebb when we're sick,' she said. 'Young boys undergoing cancer treatment don't need to be asked if they are pregnant.'
Ms O'Malley also accused the poster's authors of wrongly implying men can get pregnant as part of their desire to use gender-neutral language. 'It is also factually inaccurate because males have internal reproductive organs e.g. vas deferens, prostate and urethra,' she said.
As parts of the male reproductive system, like the prostate, are internal organs they technically meet the criteria of those who can become pregnant according to the poster.
Professor Jenny Gamble, an expert in midwifery from Coventry University, said the posted was a 'dreadful example of health communication about such an important issue'.
'Using the term, "internal reproductive organs" is so unclear,' she said.
'A basic principle of any health communication activity should be to enable people to understand their health and access the right services; this example fails this basic principle,' she said.
She added many people will struggle to unpick what the poster is referring to.
'Many well-educated women do not know the basics of their own biology and would struggle to know what were the "internal reproductive organs",' she said.
'Many people - both sexes - would struggle with categorizing male reproductive organs as internal or external. Many people do not know the definition of an "organ".'
Professor Gamble said the transgender and non-binary people NHS Tayside were trying to appease with its poster would not miss out by making the information clear to women.
'Women have specific sex-specific health needs. Avoiding ionising radiation when pregnant is one of them,' she said.
'Females that have a gender identity as trans-men or non-binary know they are female and will not be missed by referring to women.'
The wording of the NHS Tayside poster also goes against that used in Scotland's NHS and Government backed national health information service, called NHS Inform.
NHS Inform's advice reads: 'X-rays aren't usually recommended for pregnant women unless it's an emergency.' The same wording is replicated on the NHS Inform website warning for CT scans.
An NHS Tayside spokesperson defended the use of the poster saying it followed best practise guidelines.
'This poster was produced in line with the Society of Radiographers "Inclusive pregnancy status guidelines for ionising radiation",' they said.
They also added the poster was being trialled at a few sites before being rolled out more widely, and that feedback was being sought. .
'Our imaging team is trialling the poster and guidelines at three hospitals in Angus and gathering feedback from patients and other groups before it is rolled out further across other sites,' they said.
****************************************
My other blogs. Main ones below:
http://dissectleft.blogspot.com (DISSECTING LEFTISM)
http://edwatch.blogspot.com (EDUCATION WATCH)
http://antigreen.blogspot.com (GREENIE WATCH)
http://australian-politics.blogspot.com (AUSTRALIAN POLITICS)
http://snorphty.blogspot.com/ (TONGUE-TIED)
http://jonjayray.com/blogall.html More blogs
*****************************************
/>
Kristina Pimenova, once said to be the most beautiful girl in the world. Note blue eyes and blonde hair
Bliss: What every woman wants: to feel safe and secure in the arms of her man. Robert Irwin and Rorie Buckey. See 
No comments:
Post a Comment