Friday, October 29, 2021
Arizona electoral fraud
Maricopa County, Arizona, has been an important key to unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent 2020 Presidential Election. A forensic audit of the results from this critical piece to the puzzle has produced many alarming discoveries.
Nevertheless, there has been an overwhelming attempt to try to ignore anything that helps prove the obvious. Democrats stole the presidency from President Trump. Many are beginning to realize how it was done. Maricopa County isn’t the only evidence of “the steal”.
However, the radical leftist mainstream media refuses to discuss the obvious. In fact, the propaganda spewing bullhorns for the Democrat Party continue to insist that anyone who mentions voter fraud, as obvious as these facts are, is perpetrating the “big lie”.
The fake news mainstream media are the “big lie”. The more they try to B.S. the American public, the deeper the hole they dig for themselves. Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, the man credited with email as we know it today, produced a live stream talking about these strange irregularities.
One key part of the four-hour discussion was about the more than 6,000 ballots that are mysteriously missing a corresponding image. Dr. Shiva insisted that these 6,545 ballots are a suspicious missing part of the report. No one is screaming about some crazed conspiracy.
All people are asking is an explanation of why these numbers do not match up. By not giving an answer at all, Maricopa County officials look even complicit in “the steal”, which they are. Liz Harrington is now the Chief Spokesperson for President Trump, beginning early in 2021. Harrington tweeted, “Why are there 6,545 more early voting ballots than the images?”
“That's a question.” She is not insinuating anything. She’s asking a logical question. Harrington just wants to know where these critical, election-changing ballots came from. Why can’t, or won’t, the officials from Maricopa County provide simple answers to a simple question
All they do is continue to hide behind their fake news accomplices to perpetrate the real “big lie”. Maricopa County officials have been exposed for deleting voter data ahead of an audit by Senators. Now they refuse to give answers to simple, straight-forward questions.
The liberal Democrats keep trying to label all questions about irregularities found during the 2020 Presidential election as “promoting the big lie”. It’s growing more and more undeniable what the “big lie” really is. The “big lie” is the 2020 Presidential Election. It was stolen, and with it one of the most cherished parts of democracy was snatched from every American citizen.
************************************************
Biden Pick Becerra’s Indecent, Indefensible Legal Assault on Nuns, Human Life
Founded in France in 1839, the Little Sisters of the Poor is a Catholic order of nuns who operate 29 care homes across the United States. The nuns take vows of chastity, poverty, obedience, and hospitality, and they serve Christ by serving the elderly poor.
When the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (aka ACA or “Obamacare”) was enacted in March 2010, it required employers to offer health insurance plans that included contraceptives, abortifacients, and sterilizations—all of which violate the precepts of the Catholic Church.
Though the ACA exempted churches, it did not exempt faith-based ministries such as the Little Sisters of the Poor. These ministries were subject to fines if they did not comply—and the Little Sisters refused to comply.
St. Paul once wrote that all who will live godly in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution. The Obama administration was determined to make good on that biblical promise and proceeded to persecute the Little Sisters all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
In 2016, the Supreme Court directed the Obama administration to compromise with the Little Sisters and “arrive at an approach going forward” to end the standoff. The Obama administration failed to achieve that goal before leaving office.
In 2017, the Trump administration took over and structured an accommodation that resolved the Little Sisters’ problems with the ACA mandate. In October of that year, the Department of Health and Human Services issued an updated religious-exemption rule that protected religious nonprofit organizations such as the Little Sisters of the Poor.
Case closed, right? Wrong.
The next month, November 2017, attorneys general from several states, including Pennsylvania and California, ramped up the persecution of the Little Sisters. They went to court and obtained a nationwide injunction against the new HHS rule. Pennsylvania and California sued the federal government, asking the judges to force the Little Sisters to comply with the Obamacare mandate or face millions of dollars in penalties.
At that point, the Little Sisters asked the U.S. Supreme Court for a definitive ruling.
On July 8, 2020, the Supreme Court delivered a decisive 7 to 2 ruling in favor of the Little Sisters of the Poor. The court affirmed the religious liberty exemptions for faith-based organizations. The Little Sisters of the Poor would not have to pay for abortions under the Obamacare mandates.
After spending over a decade fighting federal and state governments in the courts, the Little Sisters could finally get back to serving the poor in peace.
The Little Sisters set an example for us all, refusing to back down in the face of government pressure. They were determined to serve the elderly poor without lending support or endorsement to abortion. They correctly understood that the assault on their freedom was an assault on the sanctity of human life.
Is this really why government exists? To harass and intimidate nuns who are simply living out their faith and serving the poor? It’s hard to believe, but there are people in government who get up in the morning and say, “I’m going to punish a Catholic ministry today! I’m going to scare nuns and force them to pay for abortions!”
I mean, such a person would have to be a mustache-twirling villain of the Snidely Whiplash variety, right?
Well, meet one of the persecutors of the Little Sisters of the Poor—namely, President Joe Biden’s secretary of health and human services, Xavier Becerra. In November 2017, after the Little Sisters had already prevailed once in the Supreme Court, it was Becerra [then the state attorney general] who made the decision for California to sue again in federal court to take away the nuns’ religious exemption. He lost that case in 2020—but the following year, Biden tapped Becerra to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, the very agency he had unsuccessfully sued in 2017.
In February, Becerra was in a Senate confirmation hearing for the Biden Cabinet post, trying to explain away his relentless pursuit of the Little Sisters of the Poor. Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., said to him, “It does seem like, as attorney general, you spent an inordinate amount of time and effort suing pro-life organizations, like Little Sisters of the Poor, or trying to ease restrictions or expand abortion.”
Apparently realizing how bad his pursuit of the Little Sisters looked, Becerra replied, “I have never sued the nuns, any nuns. I’ve never sued any affiliation of nuns, and my actions have always been directed at the federal agencies.”
It’s a flimsy alibi. Becerra did, in fact, sue to force a religious order of nuns to pay for Obamacare’s contraceptive and abortifacient mandates. Moreover, the case is named State of California v. Little Sisters of the Poor. It doesn’t get any plainer than that. Had Becerra won his case, the Little Sisters would have lost millions of dollars, along with their First Amendment rights. Becerra pursued the nuns in court for three years.
Despite his evasive testimony, Becerra did sue nuns, an act of cold-hearted villainy that would have done Snidely Whiplash proud. As Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., tweeted on Feb. 24, “Xavier Becerra is now claiming he didn’t sue nuns because he wants to get confirmed. But Becerra did sue nuns. He repeatedly harassed the Little Sisters of the Poor. That’s why he should be rejected by the Senate.”
In selecting Becerra to head HHS, Biden signaled his intention to move America to the extreme edge of pro-abortion policy. No American politician has ever demonstrated more enthusiasm for unrestricted abortion than Becerra.
************************************************
Why a South African cricketer refused to take a knee
South African cricket star Quinton de Kock pulled out of his side's eight-wicket Twenty20 World Cup win over the West Indies overnight.
The move was prompted by his opposition to an edict that the team was to kneel before the game in the widely understood and adopted gesture against racism.
Cricket South Africa announced the directive on Monday after the team was criticised for not having a uniform stance prior to the match on Saturday against Australia.
De Kock's move has drawn criticism, and despite the controversy the 28-year-old has received an offer of support from his captain.
But the saga is a reminder of sports' difficult history with racism in South Africa and beyond.
South Africa was up against the West Indies in its second match of the men's Twenty20 World Cup in the Middle East.
The Proteas lost their first game of the tournament to Australia, making the match against the defending champions from the Caribbean crucial.
But De Kock — wicketkeeper, star opening batsman and former captain — was not named in the team.
He had declined to take a knee in warm-up matches and his absence was initially explained as being for "personal reasons".
But shortly before the game, a statement from the country's cricket authority confirmed de Kock's opposition to the gesture was his motivation.
"Cricket South Africa (CSA) has noted the personal decision by South African wicket keeper Quinton de Kock not to 'take the knee' ahead of Tuesday's game against the West Indies," it read.
"All players had been required, in line with a directive of the CSA board on Monday evening, to 'take the knee' in a united and consistent stance against racism.
"After considering all relevant issues, including the freedom of choice of players, the Board had made it clear it was imperative for the team to be seen taking a stand against racism, especially given SA’s history.
"The Board’s view was that while diversity can and should find expression in many facets of daily lives, this did not apply when it came to taking a stand against racism."
South Africa ended up winning the match without de Kock, his replacement Reeza Hendricks hitting 39 off 30 balls as the side successfully chased down its target of 144.
South African cricket captain Temba Bavuma says he respects de Kock's decision.
"Quinton is an adult, he is a man in his own shoes, we respect his decision, we respect his convictions, and I know he'll be standing behind whatever decision he's taken."
The gesture of "taking a knee" grew from a protest against racial inequality in the USA by American football player Colin Kaepernick in 2016.
It has been adopted and accepted in the global sport community in the years since as a reminder of ongoing racial discrimination and a demand for improvement.
But some athletes have remained apathetic or resistant to the sentiment and have refused to take a knee, even as their teammates have.
*************************************
Illinois Supreme Court Rules Tax on Guns and Ammo is 'Unconstitutional'
In a huge win for the people on Tuesday, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that Cook County's tax on guns and ammo is unconstitutional.
In 2012, the Cook County Board of Commissioners approved a $25 tax on the retail purchase of a firearm within the county. The county’s Firearm Tax Ordinance was enacted in April 2013.
A separate county tax was enacted in 2015, which added $0.05 per cartridge for centerfire ammunition and $0.01 per cartridge for rimfire ammunition. Americans who fail to pay those taxes are subject to a $1,000 fine for the first offense and a $2,000 fine for subsequent offenses.
Justice Mary Jane Theis ruled that the taxes “violate the state’s constitution because they affect law-abiding citizens’ Second Amendment right to acquire firearms for self-defense,” reasoning that “While the taxes do not directly burden a law-abiding citizen’s right to use a firearm for self-defense, they do directly burden a law-abiding citizen’s right to acquire a firearm and the necessary ammunition for self-defense.”
She also declared, “Under the plain language of the ordinances, the revenue generated from the firearm tax is not directed to any fund or program specifically related to curbing the cost of gun violence. Additionally, nothing in the ordinance indicates that the proceeds generated from the ammunition tax must be specifically directed to initiatives aimed at reducing gun violence.”
****************************************
My other blogs. Main ones below:
http://dissectleft.blogspot.com (DISSECTING LEFTISM)
http://edwatch.blogspot.com (EDUCATION WATCH)
http://antigreen.blogspot.com (GREENIE WATCH)
http://australian-politics.blogspot.com (AUSTRALIAN POLITICS)
http://snorphty.blogspot.com/ (TONGUE-TIED)
*****************************************
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
/>
Kristina Pimenova, once said to be the most beautiful girl in the world. Note blue eyes and blonde hair
Bliss: What every woman wants: to feel safe and secure in the arms of her man. Robert Irwin and Rorie Buckey. See 
No comments:
Post a Comment