Wednesday, March 09, 2005

ARIZONA: ILLOGICAL FOOD FASCISTS

Candy is bad but milk is fine. Guess which is more fattening?

A bill that would limit the availability of junk food and soft drinks sold at public schools narrowly cleared its first hurdle Wednesday. The House K-12 Education Committee voted 5-4 in favor of a bill that would ban candy, gum and soft drinks during the school day but watered it down with an amendment that would exempt high schools.....

Rep. Mark Anderson, R-Mesa, introduced the bill over rising concerns about childhood obesity. State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne is backing the legislation, although he wants to see it changed back to include high schools. Horne also expressed concerns about the bill's future Wednesday, urging parents to contact their state legislators. "Right now, the field is dominated by people who sell candy and soda," he said.

Several states have introduced similar legislation and have faced tough battles getting bills passed into laws. Two states, Texas and West Virginia, have bans on junk food. In both states, high schools are exempt from the ban. Anderson amended the bill to exclude high schools because he feared it would never garner enough support to get committee approval otherwise. Limiting the ban to elementary and middle schools is better than nothing, he said.

Supporters of House Bill 2544 include the Arizona PTA, dairy farmers and directors of school food services. Opponents are the vending-machine and soft-drink industries and the Arizona School Boards Association. Critics say snack sales should be a local decision. "If parents don't like the products being offered, let them address it with their school boards," said John Moody, who represents the Arizona Beverage Association.

Lucy Ranus, Arizona PTA president, said the state must take up the cause because child health and nutrition is of state and national importance. The bill would apply only to snacks and drinks served "during the school day," so parent groups would be allowed to sell high-sugar, high-fat snacks and soft drinks after school. Arizona schools often sell snacks and soft drinks to raise money at school snack bars and in vending machines.

More here



FREE SPEECH NOW HAS NO DEFENDERS

The war on free speech continues in Congress. The crew that did its darndest to repeal the First Amendment back in 2002 -- Sens. John McCain and Russ Feingold and Reps. Chris Shays and Marty Meehan - is back, and now its looking to clean up the mess left by the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act. That mess: insidious "527" groups, like MoveOn.org's Media Fund and the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, of course.

The problem, it seems, is that there are still just too darn many independent groups allowed to go shooting their mouths off about any darn thing any darn time they want -- and they can accept pretty much any amount of money from pretty much anyone. There should be a law.

And there will be, since free-speech looks to have no defenders left in Congress. In 2002 some conservative stalwarts --people who believed that money and speech couldn't be distinguished, since it takes money to make speech heard -- tried to hold out against the McCain-Feingold mania to get money out of politics.

But this time there are far fewer brave souls. Last week, a bill was introduced in the Senate that would force 527s to register with the Federal Election Commission and restrict the groups' ability to raise and spend money. The bill enjoys the support of Trent Lott, who had been one of 41 senators to vote against McCain-Feingold. Now, however, he's decided that any money given by wealthy individuals is "sewer money."

And why is this money so dirty suddenly? "It was an unintended consequence of McCain-Feingold. Instead of going to the parties, rich people are putting money into these 527s in the dark of night," Lott told the Sun Herald in Biloxi, Miss. In other words, some of those rich people might be trying to throw out incumbents. McCain is even more blatant about the incumbent-protection angle. As The Washington Times reported last week, "McCain said lawmakers should support the bill out of self-interest, because it would prevent a rich activist from trying to defeat an incumbent by directing money into a political race through a 527 organization." "That should alarm every federally elected member of Congress," McCain said.

Indeed, it certainly does. In the House, Bob Ney, an Ohio Republican and chairman of the House Administration committee, who opposed campaign-finance reform in 2002, also seems ready to roll over.

The magic trick that reformers have managed to perform here is really something to behold. They've turned citizens into numbers. A 527 is nothing more than a group of Americans who have banded together -- 5 of them, 27 of them, 527 of them or 10,000 of them - to criticize their elected leaders, or candidates for office, and to share the costs of doing so. But by calling these people by a number, they can be made to sound shadowy and devious. The speech 527 groups engage in is fundamental to the First Amendment, yet it is exactly this speech -- not the influence behind it -- that is being targeted by Congress. So much for "Congress shall make no law."

More here

No comments: