The Times CONDEMNS COMMISSION FOR RACIAL EQUALITY

From Chris Brand:

"As the gauleiters of the CRE issued a 99-page booklet of `guidelines' on avoiding racist actions, speech or thought in the British workplace (e.g. by never spelling Mahomet's name wrongly or saying Christmas is more fun than Ramadan), a Times leading article (6 v) condemned the publication as "unreadable", full of abstractions and "daft jargon" and a preposterous imposition on employers {especially since it would doubtless lead to countless more casuistical lawsuits aiming at massive compensation for the slightest `insensitivity'}.

A few days of close study by business leaders revealed that ethnic-loving CRE was imposing on every British employer an obligation to provide a special `prayer room' and paid religious holidays for any workers feeling they needed such provisions; and employers were told that if they had no ethnics on their payroll, they must consider employing even dullard applicants lacking the required qualifications. Employment Tribunals would be obliged to enforce on employers these shameful demands by the CRE for `positive discrimination' (aka affirmative racism).

{Not to be outdone, Americans with psychological disabilities such as Attention Deficit Disorder, Asperger's Syndrome and Bipolar Disorder began demanding that the world tolerate and even compensate them for their handicaps - thus achieving a new peecee goal of `neurodiversity' (New York Times, 9 v). Ten years ago it used to be joked that PeeCee would culminate in beautiful girls and amply-tackled men being required to mutilate themselves so as to achieve the ideal of equality - the joke being intended to ridicule PeeCee. But with the dyslexic (and doubtless other disabled) now being given extra time in `university' examinations, the fantasies of modern egalitarians are increasingly foisted on the world'.