Wednesday, June 04, 2014

Multiculturalist murdered his mother-in-law in horrific sex attack

A porn addict who murdered his mother-in-law in a horrific sex attack that shocked an Old Bailey judge is facing life in jail.

Mohammud Yusuf, 32, inflicted 'the most agonising death imaginable' on Amoe Stevens, 64, while his two young sons sat in the next room listening to their grandmother's cries.

Yusuf - who had an obsession with violent pornography - carried out the sex attack on Mrs Stevens before leaving her to bleed to death at her home in Neasden, north west London.

It was only when a carer found Mrs Stevens slumped in her chair that she was rushed to hospital, where she later died.

Yusuf, also from Neasden, denied murdering Mrs Stevens but was was unanimously convicted of the charge after a trial at the Old Bailey.

When the verdict was announced, Margaret Stevens, Yusuf's wife, wept so hard that she had to be comforted by the Old Bailey matron.

The case also visibly shocked the judge, Nicholas Browne QC, who told the jury: ‘This lady suffered the most agonising death imaginable.  ‘I have never come across such a factual background of a case like this.'

During the trial, the court heard police were called by the carer found Mrs Stevens at around 8pm in October last year.

Examination of Yusuf’s phone later revealed searches for pornographic videos showing violent rape, gang rape and incest.

Prosecutor David Jeremy QC told the jury that there was a link between this interest and the injuries suffered by Mrs Stevens.

He said: ‘Why this defendant or anyone would have inflicted injuries like these on their defenceless mother-in-law is not a question to which the prosecution can provide you with a complete or satisfactory answer.  ‘But clues may be found in the contents of his phone and computers.

‘When you put alongside each other what must be a clearly deviant interest this defendant had in pain and degradation of women and what happened to Mrs Stevens, there is a relationship between them.  ‘The effect of that is that it makes it more likely that it was this defendant who would have carried out that assault.’

Both Yusuf’s sons gave evidence to the jury. The court heard both are suffering emotional problems as a result of the case and one has resorted to self-harm.

Mrs Stevens said in a victim impact statement that the case had devastated the family.

Summarising the statement, Mr Jeremy said: ‘She describes her mother as a soft-spoken, hard-workingm loving person who was the peacemaker in any disputes.  ‘She describes herself as being overwhelmed having lost her mother and her children having lost their father.

‘They are struck most of all by the complete lack of remorse that the defendant has show towards her mother, herself, her family and his two sons by defending himself.

‘He has made the experience even more agonising by refusing to face up to what he did.’

Yusuf will be sentenced on Friday. The judge warned he could face life imprisonment for the crime


Britain may soon have Muslim public holidays: Parliament petition urges MPs to consider having a day off during Hindu and Islam festivals

An online petition urging politicians to create a bank [public] holiday for Hindu festival Diwali and Muslim celebration Eid has attracted more than 119,000 signatures and could be debated in the House of Commons.

If applied, it would be the first non-Christian religious holidays in Britain and could lead to calls from other faiths for their events to also be recognised.

As the e-petition has reached 100,000 signatures it has to be considered in parliament under rules set up in 2011.

Nationalists have complained that St George’s Day and St David’s Day are not holidays but an e-petition calling for these days to be marked has only 34 signatures.

Diwali is described as the 'Festival of Lights' and is celebrated by Hindus in the Autumn while Eid is held at the end of Ramadan when Muslims break their fast.

Details of the petition are said to have been passed to the Backbench Business Committee, which will ­consider its suitability for debate.

Set up by Jon Timmis, it states: 'I believe that, given the number of Muslims and Hindus in this country it is only fair we allow them to have the most important days in their faiths recognised in law.'

The e-petition has sparked widespread debate on internet forums and social media, especially those aimed at British ­Muslims and Hindus. While religious and community leaders have ­distanced themselves from the idea, popular opinion is evenly split.

Vinod Popat, chairman of The ­British Hindu Voice, told the Sunday Express: 'I don’t think it is a very good idea. How many festivals are there for other religions. Should they all be marked with a ­public holiday?'

He also pointed out that Diwali is set on a lunar calender, so would fall on a different day every year.

David Jones said on Twitter: 'Now Parliament want to introduce public bank holidays for muslims and hindu's- this is the UK don't like it leave.'

Critics have also suggested there are enough problems with Easter, which can take place any time over a four-week period as its timing depends on the full moon and spring equinox.

However, Suleman Nagdi, of the Federation of Muslim Organisations in Leicester, told the paper: 'Any move to recognise other faiths is a good thing but I do not think there should be a public holiday.'

Graham Smith, who launched the St George Unofficial Bank Holiday campaign, has accused recent Labour and Conservative governments of anti-English bias.  He said: 'They just don’t seem to want to grasp English nationalism, they are afraid of it for some reason.'

Britain has eight days of bank holidays every year, the second lowest in the world behind Mexico


International Islam is in Australia too

Australia now has 374 mosques and in each immediate area housing values have plummeted to as low as half their former value.
Europe is graced by 6,663 mosques. In the UK alone there are 1,568, the US has 2,189 (up 74 per cent since 2000) and New Zealand has 13.

A so called mega-mosque in the south London suburb of Merton holds 10,000 bums in the air and the Muslim population within wailing earshot is now 80 percent.

Where house values have fallen, banks have reassessed their loan exposures and forced the original home owners to either pay the difference in equity or the property is sold at a mortgagee auction.

And guess who is waiting in the wings to pick up a house for half its value? Yep, a Muslim.

The right to freedom of religion is embedded deep in our Constitution but it’s starting to erode our hard-won way of life.

A Melbourne single mother of two recently sold her home at a loss (it was adjacent to a newly-built mosque) and down-sized to a unit in Bendigo only to find she was 200 metres from yet another approval, this time for a $3 million mosque.

Those opposing the new mosque had their accounts closed by Bendigo Bank which is hoping to finance the new mosque.

I hope this poor mother of two doesn’t decide to sell up again and move down the road to Ballarat because approval for yet another mosque has just passed council there.

And guess what, Queensland’s Campbell Newman this week has rejected a Bill that would prevent Muslims hiding their identity under a burqa.  The LNP has decided police have no right to know the identity of an alleged law breaker.

A courier cannot enter a bank wearing a helmet yet any bugger, man or woman, can enter a bank wearing a burqa hiding God knows what!

Hmmmm.  If bikies opt to wear burqas Campbell Newman will have a serious problem.

But an even more sinister PC problem has emerged. Customs officials have been told they cannot body scan or inspect the luggage of a disproportionate number of Middle Easterners.

Our Discrimination Act requires that little old grey-haired ladies must be equally suspected of having a bomb in their undies as does a likely looking terrorist... and Section 18C requires that we don’t discuss this apparent madness for fear of racially offending a suspected terrorist.

So, a sallow complexioned hairy bloke wearing a white crocheted cap, a flowing bed sheet and muttering “Allahu Akbar” cannot be suspected of being an Al Queda operative any more than can your Grandma? Crumbs!

Are we spending millions upgrading luggage and body scanners and security cameras only to wave suspicious Middle Easterners through customs because officials have run out of Grandmas to search?

Islamic immigration is fast reaching a tipping point where our sovereign law will be lost to Sharia law.

The barbaric cult of Islam is openly running a protection racket called “Halal Certification” within our food supply chain.

Clerics are openly preaching our destruction in Friday prayers.
Islamists openly rort our welfare system to the disadvantage of our own needy. They use multiple wives to out populate us... they want us either gone or dead!

Our legislators refuse to stem the Islamic tide for fear we become an international target while the Left and far-Left Greens continue to actively support the invasion.

There is not a peaceful place on Earth where Islam abides. Islam is at war with all non Islamists and demands subjugation or death by beheading of all non conformists.

Europe, the US, Africa, Russia and now even China are suffering their cowardly bombings. Only Japan had the foresight to insulate itself from this primitive scourge.

Utter domination is the Islamic promise of “the final solution”.
But hang on, are we hard of hearing, isn’t that exactly what they themselves foretell?


Anti-democratic E.U. Commission Shuts Down “Largest Petition in European History”

Just days after euroskeptic parties won large gains in European elections, the E.U.’s executive commission on Wednesday vetoed a citizens’ initiative – dubbed “the largest petition in European history” – which sought an end to E.U. funding for any practice that terminates human life before birth, including abortion and research that destroys human embryos.

The decision came on the final day of the outgoing commission, headed by President Jose Manuel Barroso, who has been in office since 2004.

Its ruling said, in effect, that the current rules should remain since the European Parliament (E.P.) had recently agreed upon them, and they were therefore “appropriate.” As a result, the commission would not “submit a legislative proposal” on the matter.

Critics slammed the move both because the decision retains the current situation, but also because in their view it made a mockery of a process purportedly designed to improve participatory democracy in the 28-member union by giving ordinary citizens a say in lawmaking.

The tool known as the European citizens’ initiative (ECI), introduced in 2012, was touted as a major reform innovation. It set rigorous requirements: Organizers had a limited amount of time to garner at least one million signatures, including a prescribed minimum number from each of at least seven member-states.

The pro-life ECI, called “One of Us,” met the requisite national targets and in the end obtained more than 1.8 million signatures within the time allowed. It counted Pope Francis among its supporters.

Under ECI rules, the commission has that meets the requirements and decide on whether to submit a legislative proposal on the relevant issue to Euro-lawmakers.

The committee which organized the “One of Us” campaign slammed Wednesday’s announcement, describing the commission as “deaf” and saying it had made “a travesty” of what was intended to be “a real instrument of participative democracy.”

“Such veto power is illegitimate and anti-democratic since politically, it is the European legislature that may give a verdict on the content of the initiative, and not the commission, otherwise, the ECI mechanism would be meaningless,” it said in a statement.

Well, what do you know… someone is complaining about the illegitimate and anti-democratic commission. The “ECI mechanism is meaningless”. Seriously?

Hey, there’s a whole heap of meaninglessness in Brussels; this is just a tiny piece of the grease machine’s effluvia. But who’da thunk anyone was going to notice, much less give a fig? “Settled consensus” issues like abortion, euthanasia, climate poo, etc., will just have to wait for the Mid-Century Weed-Out, coming to a polity near you:

It’s Not the End of the World, It’s Just the End of You: The Great Extinction of the Nations

Meanwhile, here’s the the risible attempt of those extremist haters who would interfere with issues that well-mannered people don’t discuss. Or rather, they won’t be discussing it for another generation or so. Then we’ll see.



Political correctness is most pervasive in universities and colleges but I rarely report the  incidents concerned here as I have a separate blog for educational matters.

American "liberals" often deny being Leftists and say that they are very different from the Communist rulers of  other countries.  The only real difference, however, is how much power they have.  In America, their power is limited by democracy.  To see what they WOULD be like with more power, look at where they ARE already  very powerful: in America's educational system -- particularly in the universities and colleges.  They show there the same respect for free-speech and political diversity that Stalin did:  None.  So look to the colleges to see  what the whole country would be like if "liberals" had their way.  It would be a dictatorship.

For more postings from me, see TONGUE-TIED, GREENIE WATCH,   EDUCATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL, FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC, AUSTRALIAN POLITICS and  DISSECTING LEFTISM.   My Home Pages are here or   here or   here.  Email me (John Ray) here


No comments: